logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages<12
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
davethescope  
#21 Posted : 02 September 2014 14:07:22(UTC)
davethescope
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 15/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 475
Man
United Kingdom
Location: Whaley Bridge

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Whaley Laner Go to Quoted Post
The reason why C9 will become a housing estate is down to Caitlin Bisknell and her Labour council colleagues who have shown no interest in local opinion or the effects this decision will have on Whaley Bridge. It will be a long time before Whaley Bridge residents forget how shabbily they have been treated and this may well be remembered at the next election.



Caitlin Biskell is the Labour Party candidate for High Peak at the General Election next May and I hope that the electors will remember C9 when they mark their cross.   But it a difficult choice to make:   a decent hard-working bloke who represents a party I detest:   a useless piece of xxxx who represents a party which I admire: an unknown candidate who represents a party of political opportunists.   Might be the  first time I abstain
The optimist believes that Whaley Bridge is the best place in the world to live. The pessimist fears he might be correct.
G. Jackson  
#22 Posted : 02 September 2014 16:10:53(UTC)
G. Jackson
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 17/08/2009(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Whaley Bridge at heart

Before anyone starts blaming others for the failure of the protest against the new housing estate they should watch the film Brassed Off. 
I believe the estate was going to be built whatever protests were made.

G.J.
Wanderer returns  
#23 Posted : 03 September 2014 04:42:00(UTC)
Wanderer returns
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 09/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 148
Location: Whaley Vegas

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 6 post(s)
Sadly I agree Mr Jackson, the application would have gone back and forth with little tweeks and be passed at some point. I think it's a real shame but the decision has been made now. The next step I would suggest is to more work alongside the decision makers and try to mould decisions to suit the locals rather than being antagonistic towards them as it's going to appen anyway.
RockBanker  
#24 Posted : 03 September 2014 17:00:55(UTC)
RockBanker
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 09/04/2009(UTC)
Posts: 515
Man
Location: &quot;In a primitive area and on a steep hill&quot;

Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Whaley Laner Go to Quoted Post
It was a very sad day when planning permission was granted on C9. John Pritchard David Lomax and Linda Leather did their best to represent Whaley Bridge and should be congratulated for their efforts. The reason why C9 will become a housing estate is down to Caitlin Bisknell and her Labour council colleagues who have shown no interest in local opinion or the effects this decision will have on Whaley Bridge. It will be a long time before Whaley Bridge residents forget how shabbily they have been treated and this may well be remembered at the next election.


I rarely venture into party politics, however I do thing that Whaley Laner is being a little disingenuous in attempting to pin the all the blame on the Labour members of the HPBC. The matter of the current governments planning policy deserves some scrutiny as the (admittedly wet and liberal) Daily Telegraph has been pointing out for some years.

http://www.telegraph.co....arth/hands-off-our-land/

   

Edited by user 03 September 2014 17:04:54(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Rock "Yellow Alert" Banker

TheShallcrossCode@hotmail.co.uk
Wanderer returns  
#25 Posted : 04 September 2014 18:14:45(UTC)
Wanderer returns
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 09/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 148
Location: Whaley Vegas

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 6 post(s)
Disingenuous - great word!
RockBanker  
#26 Posted : 05 September 2014 08:31:02(UTC)
RockBanker
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 09/04/2009(UTC)
Posts: 515
Man
Location: &quot;In a primitive area and on a steep hill&quot;

Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Wanderer returns Go to Quoted Post
Disingenuous - great word!



I find few political statements to which it cannot be applied.
Rock "Yellow Alert" Banker

TheShallcrossCode@hotmail.co.uk
Horwich Ender  
#27 Posted : 05 September 2014 18:28:37(UTC)
Horwich Ender
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 16/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 559

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)

Good evening.

It is not over yet.

The legal battle continues:

http://www.buxtonadvertiser.co.uk/news/local/judicial-review-over-whaley-housing-1-6823334


Whaley Laner  
#28 Posted : 16 September 2014 10:13:47(UTC)
Whaley Laner
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 02/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 114

Thanks: 28 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)

Rockbanker thinks I am being disingenuous but I have no doubt in my mind that Caitlin Bisknell and her Labour council colleagues are responsible for the approval of planning permission for a housing estate on the greenfield site between Linglongs Road and Macclesfield Road.

The lack of affordable housing is an enormous problem in this country brought about by the previous Labour government. Since 1997 planning policies have been tightened due to Tony Blair buckling to pressure from the green lobby whilst at the same time immigration has spiralled upwards. A combination of fewer houses being built and an increasing population for 13 years is a recipe for rising house prices and a national housing crisis especially for the young and the poor in society.

Figures have now been released showing the number of affordable housing delivered by each local authority between 2010 and 2014. Of the 331 Local Authorities in England High Peak came 309 only delivering 120 houses during this period. This confirms the Borough Council under the Labour leadership of Caitlin Bisknell has failed in providing much needed housing for less well off people in High Peak.

Most residents agree new houses need to be built but the crucial decision is where to build them. I believe this is the reason the Local Housing Plan idea was introduced to ensure sufficient houses are built whilst allowing local people to decide where to build them. This is far more preferable than sites being imposed by civil servants in Whitehall.

An adopted Local Plan should stop unwanted developments but a major problem arises when you have an incompetent Borough Council who after more than three years in control and more than two years of shambolic preparation have still not been able to deliver an adopted Local Plan. This makes every green field in the High Peak vulnerable to a planning application.

High Peak Borough Council have now submitted a Local Plan for approval of the Planning Inspectorate but the decision of the Development Control Committee on 4 August to approve the application for 107 houses on the greenfield site between Linglongs Road and Macclesfield Road makes a complete nonsense of the newly agreed Local Plan as the application by Gladman Developments is for almost twice the area of the C9 site contained within the Local Plan that is currently being considered for approval..

The Development Control Committee is dominated by Labour Councillors from outside Whaley Bridge and they ignored a number of well founded planning objections to the proposal purely because of the need to allocate more land for housing. When it came to the vote all the Labour Councillors present at the meeting voted in favour of approving planning permission making the votes of the other councillors meaningless. The decision of the Labour controlled committee has meant a costly legal battle is required to challenge the decision to approve planning permission.

There are plenty of brownfield sites in High Peak which are suitable for development and would accommodate the required number of dwellings but these have not been adequately explored due to the incompetence of the council. None of the speakers at the Development Control meeting thought Linglongs Road / Macclesfield Road was an appropriate place to build but all the Labour Councillors voted for approval because they no longer have sufficient time to find other more suitable sites to meet the predicted demand for housing and would prefer an unsuitable development in Whaley Bridge rather than Buxton or Glossop.

I still believe Whaley Bridge residents will remember how shabbily they have been treated by Caitlin Bisknell and her Labour council colleagues when they cast their votes in future elections including next years General Election when Caitlin Bisknell is the Labour Party candidate and thinks she should be our next MP.


 


Jonny Summers  
#29 Posted : 16 September 2014 18:33:58(UTC)
Jonny Summers
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 18/04/2011(UTC)
Posts: 105
Location: Whaley Bridge

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Have you EVER posted anything that didn't have a go at the Labour Party? Far from blaming the last Labour government for the lack of social/affordable housing (although I do blame them for many other things) I think most people would agree it was Thatcher's policy of selling council houses off and then preventing the council from building replacements that has led to high house prices all over the country and the lack of social housing in general!!! ...and NO, I'm not a Labour supporter or even Labour voter!
Whaley Laner  
#30 Posted : 19 September 2014 10:48:08(UTC)
Whaley Laner
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 02/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 114

Thanks: 28 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Jonny Summers Go to Quoted Post
Have you EVER posted anything that didn't have a go at the Labour Party? Far from blaming the last Labour government for the lack of social/affordable housing (although I do blame them for many other things) I think most people would agree it was Thatcher's policy of selling council houses off and then preventing the council from building replacements that has led to high house prices all over the country and the lack of social housing in general!!! ...and NO, I'm not a Labour supporter or even Labour voter!

Thatcher was responsible for many things but I don't think she can be blamed for the granting of planning permission to build 107 houses between Linglongs Road / Macclesfield Road or the fact that High Peak Borough Council have built fewer affordable homes than 93% of other local authorities in England between 2010 and 2014. Our local borough councillors Linda Leather David Lomax and John Pritchard did their best but I still believe those responsible for a beautiful area of Whaley Bridge being turned into a housing estate are Caitlin Bisknell Godfrey Claff and their Labour colleagues on High Peak Borough Council.


RockBanker  
#31 Posted : 18 October 2014 09:45:53(UTC)
RockBanker
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 09/04/2009(UTC)
Posts: 515
Man
Location: &quot;In a primitive area and on a steep hill&quot;

Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 4 post(s)
New flats in Hogs Yard?

http://www.buxtonadverti...-whaley-bridge-1-6897964



http://planning.highpeak...earchServlet?PKID=172104

Edited by user 18 October 2014 09:52:24(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Rock "Yellow Alert" Banker

TheShallcrossCode@hotmail.co.uk
Whaley Laner  
#32 Posted : 28 November 2014 12:53:39(UTC)
Whaley Laner
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 02/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 114

Thanks: 28 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Here's confirmation that the green fields around Whaley Bridge are 'meat for the wolves' because of the ineptitude of Caitlin Bisknell Godfrey Claff and the Labour controlled Borough Council who have failed to adopt a Local Plan.

http://www.dailymail.co....ission-build-fields.html

Users browsing this topic
2 Pages<12
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.