Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 19/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,494
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
On checking the Bleachers Association and Edward Hall and Brother Ltd drawing of 1921 which shows all the old pipe runs, leases etc there is only one chimney shown within Botany land and that is the one to the immediate side of Long Hill.
There is no other chimney shown so I think that must be the one in the photo. How else did the plant operate without a chimney?
As the old workings and bale chute are in the immediate vicinity then I am convinced the old Botany chimney is the one in the strange photo unless anyone can convince me otherwise.
R. S-S
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 01/08/2010(UTC) Posts: 335 Location: uk
|
The Shallcross Hall pit was as described by RSS, with the trucks running down past where the scout hut now stands, you would not have seen that chimney from Horwich end as it was a similar height as the pit head it was octagonal and was castlated on the top, dont forget there is quiet a bend on long hill coming up Buxton Rd from the traffic lights, the old Botnay chimney was a fair height and as you can see from this photo of the Whaley Bridge Volunteers Band heading up Long hill, taken from just where the packhorse route crosses from Taxal to Shallcross, the chimney is clearly visible in the background, if you look carefully you can see also the Goyt mill chimney and the much taller Printworks Chimney in the distance. Edited by user 30 December 2012 21:58:13(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified shallcross attached the following image(s): |
Shallcross |
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 23/01/2010(UTC) Posts: 198
|
Attached are a couple of pics taken yesterday
Firstly we have a chute or steps down to Botany Works.
Unable to find any Chimney bricks at the correct site but found this rather long Flue liner :-)
Found these old iron pipes on the old incline from the Shallcross Hall pit-one was in the hedge and the other now used as part of a gate.
Cheers Edited by user 31 December 2012 11:04:47(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified BarryRudd attached the following image(s): |
sometimes over the hill - but never far away. |
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 19/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,494
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Hi Barry,
Just a few points regarding photo 1 of your collection:
The bale chute is slightly to the right of the steps and it is where the bales were slid down to the factory below.
The flat area is where the entrance hole was concreted over as I said in one of my previous posts. It is now covered over with moss and vegetation. (That is the hole is covered with moss and vegetation not my posting).
On the top left corner of your photo you will see the sloping roofs where the fox managed to get trapped.
Thanks to Shallcross for finally solving the conundrum and showing another photo of the ancient Botany chimney.
I've never seen that one before Shallcross; good work.
R. S-S
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 26/10/2011(UTC) Posts: 18 Location: UK
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Maybe "Everybody" already knows this, but on the maps in earlier posts, there is a boundary marked through the middle of the works, east of the Goyt. Does this signify that the course of the river was diverted to the west, with the old boundary being retained? ( I think there is a similar feature around Goyt Mill, and Blackbrook at Buxworth/Bugsworth)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 19/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,494
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
As I have no idea what you are talking about perhaps you could show me this boundary and explain what you think it might be.
R. S-S
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 26/10/2011(UTC) Posts: 18 Location: UK
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
The dashed line on the maps in posts 52 and 57 through the Botney factory. The centre-line of a river often denoted a boundary of parish/borough/county , and the boundary remained even if the river changed course. I had never spotted this one before.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 01/08/2010(UTC) Posts: 335 Location: uk
|
Interesting Capital
The river even in 1283 when this was the great forest of Campana was described and dedicated as a boundary, but I agree it does seem from the map that the course was changed to give more room for the development of Botany keeping all the development to one side of the Goyt, the water was all important to the process so makes sense that they would utilise it to the best of their ability, I know some of it runs between man made walls but does it all around the site? |
Shallcross |
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 19/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,494
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
The lines have absolutely nothing to do with boundaries. They stretch from one end of the map to the other and presumably carry on to the next page and have followed on from the previous page.
I am fairly certain they are some sort of datum points.
On the Bleacher’s Association Limited/ Edward Hall and Brother Limited map of 1921 the dotted lines start from about the Holy Trinity Church on Buxton Road and finish in Park Wood a few hundred yards from Mellands.
Edward Hall and Brother Limited never owned land to anywhere near that extent and there is no way that the course of the Goyt has ever been changed.
Yes I agree with Shallcross there were two man made watercourses (Goats) within the Botany and these were taken from the river to avoid the necessity of pumping.
They worked on the same principal as the Taxal Duckpond feeder and the water taken from the river to drive the water wheel of the corn Mill on Bridge Street using a lesser gradient than what was naturally occurring.
I’ll dig out the Botany leases and have a look if there is anything on them about boundaries. Well I know there is but it is, as usual, in amongst a load of legal gobbledygook.
So please bear with me.
I may have to start a new thread just about the Botany Works so this one doesn’t lose its original purpose.
R. S-S
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Administration, Member Joined: 06/09/2010(UTC) Posts: 94 Location: Around and about
Thanks: 4 times Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
|
The lines referred to denote the boundary between Derbyshire and Cheshire and do indeed suggest that the river may have changed its course at some time in the past long before the Botany works was built. I think that RSS is confusing these boundary marks with those finer marks along the main road.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 19/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,494
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Hi Tarboat,
No; I am not confusing the lines with any other lines but I do see what you mean about the lines dividing Derbyshire and Cheshire.
That certainly makes sense. And if that is indeed the case then the lines have nothing to do with the factory boundaries.
Shall we save this for a new thread about the Botany?
It has been well worth discussing and has added to the background of an unusual photograph.
This is what this forum should be about.
Thank you for your help Tarboat.
I'll try to find another unusual photograph later today for further debate.
R. S-S
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/07/2009(UTC) Posts: 794 Location: furness vale Thanks: 3 times
|
I can offer no clues about this photo and can only assume that it is local. There is a roughly laid contractors railway in the foreground. The group of men are pictured on a bridge which is clearly arched so I assume that it is intended to carry a road rather than a railway. It is quite a large team of workers so it must be a reasonable sized project. What then is being constructed and what does it cross? That looks like moorland in the background but otherwise there is no indication of location.
Can anybody suggest an answer ? parabuild attached the following image(s):
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 08/06/2010(UTC) Posts: 167 Location: Whaley Bridge
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Sometimes an elevated view is all it needs.
Ferni attached the following image(s): |
Speak your truth quietly and clearly, and listen to others -even to the dull and the ignorant; they too have their story. |
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 19/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,494
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
That is the most recent Botany chimney and nothing to do with the one we have been discussing.
R. S-S
|
|
|
|
Rank: *Banned*
Groups: Guest
Joined: 22/02/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,461
|
Yet another mystery chimney, it would be located at the back of Albert House the first large house just after the Swan in the direction of Disley. The home for many years of the Kinder Press owners Eric and Stephen Evans. There was in fact also a small reservoir at the back of the house, may still be there.
No idea what the chimney was for?
(Apart from smoke) oldcodger attached the following image(s):
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/07/2009(UTC) Posts: 794 Location: furness vale Thanks: 3 times
|
Looking at the 19th and early 20th century maps I am not able to find anythng that would account for this chimney. There had been a brickyard but that was nearer to Disley and probably closed before the houses in the photo were built. The only other chimneys in that direction might have been at Bank End Colliery but this one is too near to be that. Could it be the famous photoshop chimney ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 01/08/2010(UTC) Posts: 335 Location: uk
|
Looks very suspicious to me zoom in and you can see where it has been cut and pasted what an idiot |
Shallcross |
|
|
|
Rank: *Banned*
Groups: Guest
Joined: 22/02/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,461
|
shallcross wrote:Looks very suspicious to me zoom in and you can see where it has been cut and pasted what an idiot
http://www.picturenewmills.org.uk/frontend.php?action=zoom&keywords=Ref_No_increment;MATCHES;(^| +)n00216($| +)&continueUrl=ZnJvbnRlbmQucGhwPyZrZXl3b3Jkcz1uZXd0b3duJmFjdGlvbj1zZWFyY2g=
The picture is from New Mills Local History site,
Perhaps you should convey your opinion to them.
Just seach under Newtown if above link fails.
Ref No:
n00216
Title:
Buxton Road, Newtown looking from the Swan Hotel towards Disley. Row in middle is Brighton Terrace.
There you go now the ref: No.
Edited by user 11 January 2013 15:37:32(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 18/06/2012(UTC) Posts: 28 Location: Whaley Bridge
|
While we're on the theme of strange towers, any body know what this used to be seen at the bottom of Old Road? Benno attached the following image(s):
|
|
|
|
Rank: *Banned*
Groups: Guest
Joined: 22/02/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,461
|
I now believe that the chimney in fact belonged to Wright Howarth’s Bleach Works. Almost opposite Albert House near the Swan.
New Mills history Society have somehow managed to mirror turn the image left to right it should in fact be as below. May have been taken from a photographic slide.
So untangle your knickers Shallcross
oldcodger attached the following image(s):
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.